RR.NET Forums

[King Moonraiser]

Comedy can be absurd, it can be based on observed human behavior, and it can also be slapstick. However, just because a situation is absurd, uses stereotypes, or even if it involves slapstick pratfalls, does not necessarily mean it's funny. This episode is an example of how unfunny such attempts at comedy can be.

Confusing a monster for a human could be a funny situation. What it takes is for the viewer to believe that the characters in the story could reasonably mistake the creature for a normal person. Making a gross joke involving earwax can be funny. However, just inserting the word "earwax" in a sentence is not funny in of itself. Using a plot device that sends a character into a fit can be very funny. But if the trigger mechanism can't be integrated into the story properly, (or in an absurd manner that's also funny), it's comedic effect will be diminished. Stereotypes can be used effectively for comedic effect. But, can someone please explain what the heck the significance of the turtle race in Minnesota had on the story?

It's a little disheartening that so many episodes this season have relied on gimmicks. I'll admit, even the return of the RRBs was a gimmick, but at least THAT one worked. Why? Because I'm biased? No, because there were genuinely funny scenes in those episodes. If the writers would have propped up the RRBs as cardboard villains in dumb situations, the episodes would have sucked. Period.

One and a half stars

http://www.rowdyruff.net/reviews_s6.shtml#6_4-2